1. N1 & E1 are preferred over N2 & E2 for the same route
2. When N1 & E1 have the same route to the destination, The one that have lower cost / Metric will win and get into the route table
3. If both N1 & E1 have the same cost, P-bit in N1 will be used to break the tide.
4. If P-bit is 0 (Then it would become E1) then we will have 2 E1 routes install into the routing table. (otherwise if maximum-path = 1, LSA with Higher Router-ID will get installed)
See rfc 3101 for details.
Update1. Cisco IOS OSPF realization is significantly differs from RFC:
http://blog.ioshints.info/2008/01/e1-and-e2-routes-in-ospf.html This article is outdated.
Update2. Enable 'capability rfc1587' to fall back to the "E2 is preferred over N2" route selection algorithm.
2. When N1 & E1 have the same route to the destination, The one that have lower cost / Metric will win and get into the route table
3. If both N1 & E1 have the same cost, P-bit in N1 will be used to break the tide.
4. If P-bit is 0 (Then it would become E1) then we will have 2 E1 routes install into the routing table. (otherwise if maximum-path = 1, LSA with Higher Router-ID will get installed)
See rfc 3101 for details.
Update1. Cisco IOS OSPF realization is significantly differs from RFC:
http://blog.ioshints.info/2008/01/e1-and-e2-routes-in-ospf.html This article is outdated.
Update2. Enable 'capability rfc1587' to fall back to the "E2 is preferred over N2" route selection algorithm.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий